Why is the permission string 'lrwxrwxrwx' not meaningful for a symbolic link?

Study for the OSCP Linux Exam. Use our flashcards and multiple-choice questions to test your skills. Each query comes with detailed hints and explanations to enhance your preparedness. Get ready to conquer the exam!

Multiple Choice

Why is the permission string 'lrwxrwxrwx' not meaningful for a symbolic link?

Explanation:
Symbolic links are pointers, not objects with their own meaningful access rights. Access is determined by the target file and the directories involved, not by the link itself. The leading “l” shows it’s a link, and the rest of the rwx bits are just placeholders that don’t gate access. So lrwxrwxrwx isn’t meaningful for a link because those permissions don’t apply to what you can actually access through the link; you follow the link to its target and check the target’s permissions instead. If you need the link’s own metadata, you can inspect it with tools like lstat, but those bits don’t affect access control.

Symbolic links are pointers, not objects with their own meaningful access rights. Access is determined by the target file and the directories involved, not by the link itself. The leading “l” shows it’s a link, and the rest of the rwx bits are just placeholders that don’t gate access. So lrwxrwxrwx isn’t meaningful for a link because those permissions don’t apply to what you can actually access through the link; you follow the link to its target and check the target’s permissions instead. If you need the link’s own metadata, you can inspect it with tools like lstat, but those bits don’t affect access control.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy